滇西北峨眉山玄武岩与冈达概组下段玄武岩 对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国地调局地调项目(1212011120587);成都理工大学矿物学、岩石学、矿床学国家重点(培育)学科建设项目(SZD0407)


A comparative study of Emeishan basalt and Gangdagai Formation basalt in northwest Yunnan Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究区峨眉山玄武岩分布于扬子地块西缘,冈达概组分布于其邻区的中咱微陆块。峨眉山玄武岩与冈达概组下段玄武岩均具有富碱、高钛特征,大部分属于碱性玄武岩系列,峨眉山玄武岩Mg#变化范围为0.31~0.70,属于适度演化过的岩浆,冈达概组下段玄武岩Mg#=0.34~0.43。总体上,冈达概组下段玄武岩比峨眉山玄武岩更富Ti,高FeO*,低MgO,低SiO2。两组玄武岩均有轻稀土强烈富集的特征,富集大离子亲石元素和高场强元素,但部分具有Sr、Zr负异常,均属板内玄武岩,岩浆来源于富集地幔,在地幔柱作用下产生。峨眉山玄武岩Rb、Ba有明显的波动,可能是受到源区混染作用影响,其微量元素比值表现出EM1-OIB与EM2-OIB的混合特征,起源于石榴石二辉橄榄岩,熔融程度为4%~7%。冈达概组下段玄武岩元素比值较稳定,与EM1-OIB具有很大的相似性,也起源于石榴石稳定区,其形成深度比峨眉山玄武岩深,熔融程度较低,为2%~5%,可能是产生于地幔柱边缘。中咱微陆块、扬子地台西缘的二叠系玄武岩源区物质均受峨眉山地幔柱影响,具有很大的亲源性,峨眉山地幔柱的活动为板块的裂解提供了动力。

    Abstract:

    The Jiulong Emeishan basalt is distributed on the western margin of Yangtze block, and the Gangdagai Formation baslat is distributed in Zhongza massif in the neighborhood of Yangtze block. They both have rich alkali, high titanium characteristics, thus mostly belonging to the alkaline basalt series. On the whole, Gangdagai Formation basalt exhibits richer Ti, higher FeO*, lower MgO, lower SiO2 and lower Mg#(0.34~0.43). Jiulong Emeishan basalt exhibits higher Mg#(0.31~0.70), thus belonging to the moderate evolution magma. The two groups of basalt are both characterized by strong enrichment of light rare earth elements, and enrichment of LILE and HFSE (Th, Ta, Nb, Hf), partly with Sr, Zr negative anomalies, hence belonging to the plate basalts derived from the enriched mantle under the influence of mantle plume. Rb, Ba in Jiulong Emeishan basalt show obvious fluctuation, probably influenced by source area contamination; the trace element ratios show features of EM1-OIB and EM2-OIB mixture, suggesting the origination from garnet lherzolite, with molten degree being 4%~7%. The element ratios of lower Gangdagai Formation basalt are stable, and EM1-OIB shows great similarities, suggesting that its formation depth was deeper than that of Jiulong Emeishan basalt, that its origination was from an garnet stable region with low molten degree (2%~5%), and that it was produced at the mantle plume edge. The source area materials of basalt distributed in Zhongza massif and the western margin of Yangzi landmass were influenced by Emeishan mantle plume, with obvious familiarity, and the activities of Emeishan mantle plume provided power for plate splitting.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吕劲松,肖渊甫,邓江红,王涛,程超杰,龚婷婷,于海军,邓元兵,2013,滇西北峨眉山玄武岩与冈达概组下段玄武岩 对比研究[J].岩石矿物学杂志,32(1):73~89. L&#; Jing-song, XIAO Yuan-fu, DENG Jiang-hong, WANG Tao, CHENG Chao-jie, GONG Ting-ting, YU Hai-jun, DENG Yuan-bing,2013,A comparative study of Emeishan basalt and Gangdagai Formation basalt in northwest Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica,32(1):73~89.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-08
  • 最后修改日期:2012-11-08
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: